“We
want students to be effective communicators, to be
discriminating critical thinkers, to have content knowledge, to
be life-long learners, to have aesthetic appreciation, and
so on. The problem with goals is that they are basically invisible. How
can one tell if students possess these attributes? During assessment
training sessions, faculty members often say, “I can tell that my
students are learning because I can see it in their eyes.” This is
nonsense, of course, because the clairvoyance claimed by the faculty
members is neither reproducible nor transferable to anyone else. Hence,
we need to do assessment in order to figure out how effective our
curriculum is at producing the desired learning. But if goals are
inherently invisible, how do we assess whether students have actually
learned them? The key is to assess visible indicators. This means
translating goals into associated, tangible learning objectives. In
order to make this translation, professors need to answer this question:
“What would you, a reasoned skeptic, need to witness in order to be
convinced that students were on the path toward achieving the designated
goal?” For example, if
the goal is effective communication in a chemistry student, then
the learning objective might be delivery of a speech on a technically
complex topic using jargon-free speech to a lay audience. The speech
would be an indicator that the student is an effective
communicator and that the curriculum is effective in producing students
with this attribute” Dr. Douglas Eder Southern Illinois University
Edwardsville (SIUE).
Proceed to Navigating the
Website