![]() |
Assessing Student Learning in Higher Education |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Section 1 Introduction Section 2 Background and Rationale for Assessment Section 3 Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs)
Section 4 Section 5
Section
6
Section
7
Section
8
Section
9
|
Create an Assessment Tool
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
1. Does the assessment adequately evaluate academic performance relevant to the desired outcome? (validity) |
|
|
2. Does this assessment tool enable students with different learning styles or abilities to show you what they have learned and what they can do? |
|
|
3. Does the content examined by the assessment align with the content from the course? (Content validity) |
|
|
4. Does this assessment method adequately address the knowledge, skills, abilities, behavior, and values associated with the intended outcome? (Domain validity) |
|
|
5. Will the assessment provide information at a level appropriate to the outcome? (Bloom’s) |
|
|
6. Will the data accurately represent what the student can do in an authentic or real life situation? (Authentic assessment) |
|
|
7. Is the grading scheme consistent; would a student receive the same grade for the same work on multiple evaluations? (Reliability) |
|
|
8. Can multiple people use the scoring mechanism and come up with the same general score? (Reliability) |
|
|
9. Does the assessment provide data that is specific enough for the desired outcomes? (alignment with SLO) |
|
|
10. Is the assessment summative or formative - if formative does it generate diagnostic feedback to improve learning? |
|
|
11. Is the assessment summative or formative - if summative, is the final evaluation built upon multiple sources of data? (AAHE Good practice) |
|
|
12. If this is a summative assessment, have the students had ample opportunity for formative feedback and practice displaying what they know and can do? |
|
|
13. Is the assessment unbiased or value-neutral, minimizing an attempt to give desirable responses and reducing any cultural misinterpretations? |
|
|
14. Are the intended uses for the assessment clear? (Grading, program review, both) |
|
|
15. Have other faculty provided feedback? |
|
|
16. Has the assessment been pilot-tested? |
|
|
17. Has the evaluation instrument been normed? |
|
|
18. Will the information derived from the assessment help to improve teaching and learning? (AAHE Good Practice) |
|
|
19. Will you provide the students with a copy of the rubric or assignment grading criteria? |
|
|
20. Will you provide the students examples of model work? |
|
Janet Fulks
Assessing Student Learning in Community Colleges (2004), Bakersfield
College
jfulks@bakersfieldcollege.edu
07/11/2006