Benefits
and Concerns of Classroom Assessment
|
|
Stakeholders |
Benefits |
Concerns |
|
Students |
 |
Explicitly describes expectations (Students
know expectations for each piece of work) |
 |
Allows students to prioritize goals |
 |
Focuses student efforts on what is necessary |
 |
Enables students to select schools and courses
based on clearly defined outcomes |
 |
Provides immediate, diagnostic feedback |
|
 |
Extra work beyond
course or program material |
 |
Impact on final
grades |
 |
Frequency of assessments |
 |
Anonymity of results |
|
|
Individual Faculty |
 |
Clearly defines the student performance
expectations |
 |
Helps define content coverage |
 |
Directs assignments and assessment techniques
|
 |
Provides structure to integrate
multidisciplinary issues & delineates role of GE outcomes
|
 |
Defines the full array of competencies
(cognitive, affective, and psychomotor) |
 |
Ensures incorporation of skills and attitudes,
not just cognitive outcomes |
 |
Incorporates more critical thinking outcomes
and deep learning |
 |
Focuses attention on direct learning outcomes |
 |
Provides immediate feedback on effectiveness
of pedagogy and curriculum |
 |
Improves student learning |
 |
Initiates faculty dialogue and interaction |
|
 |
Training |
 |
Extra time to develop initially SLOs and
assessment tools |
 |
Intrusiveness from administration or external
agencies |
 |
Increases workload logging data and writing reports |
 |
Challenges academic freedom
|
 |
Intellectual reductionism exhibited by national
over-reliance on standardized multiple choice tests |
|
Do's
|
Don'ts
|
|
Do define expectations and
criteria explicitly, hand out SLOs and rubrics. |
Don't norm or rank students
based on their hard work or participation, assessment is based on
competence and ability to meet criteria. |
|
Do describe which
assessments are part of the grading process and which are anonymous
and for feedback only. |
Don't be embarrassed when
needs for improvement become evident - no one is perfect |
|
Do focus on the appropriate
level of Bloom's taxonomy and the three domains. |
Don't focus on effortless
recall, simplistic thinking skills, or factoids. |
|
Do reflect on the
cognitive, psychomotor, and affective outcomes. |
Don't neglect important
outcomes because they appear difficult to assess. |
|
Do make assignments and
grading criteria public. |
Don't ignore the public
demand for accountability - you have reasons for doing things the way
you do, just articulate these. |
|
Do create multiple methods
to assess students' ability. |
Don't depend upon a very
few assessments that are all identical in nature, allowing only
certain students to display what they can do. |
|
Do provide adequate
opportunity for formative assessment. |
Don't create high stakes
assessments without opportunities to improve. |
|
Do provide detailed and
diagnostic feedback. |
Don't allow assigning
grades or scoring to take precedence over providing meaningful
feedback. |
|
Do openly discuss and
critically review one another’s assessments with the goal of enhancing
classroom instruments. |
Don't develop graded
elements last or in a hurry, independent of desired outcomes or
lacking in scoring criteria. |
|
Do use assessment as a
teaching tool to prompt learning. |
Don't assume that
assessment is an add-on, use it to improve learning as a strong
motivational force. |
|
Do pay attention to
confidentiality. |
Don't share or report data
that may reveal individual student's performance. |
|
Do consider workload and
use realistic and effective assessment plans. |
Don't try to do everything
at once without closing the loop and improving anything. |
|
Do use student feedback to
adjust SLOs, assignments, rubrics, and pedagogy |
Don't be afraid to change
and use collegial dialogue to validate changes. |