Annual Program Review
(APR) FAQ (Draft 14, May 6, 2011)
Who prepares it?
The department/unit
What does the APR
look like?
- Includes a
mechanism to ensure curriculum review occurs at least every six years for every
course (currently curriculum review occurs prior to program review every six
years).
- Uses
current unit plan format with limited additional questions (examples):
- What curricular changes has the
department/unit made including adding or deleting courses; adding
prerequisites; changing units; and modifying, adding, or deleting degrees and
certificates? (just for instructional areas)
- What curricular changes has the
department/unit made in online and distance education?
- What department/unit best practices
might help other college departments/units? Include contact information.
- How do the Retention/Success rates
of Face-to-Face courses vs. Online/Distance Ed courses compare?
- How do the Retention/Success rates
of large classes vs. small classes compare?
- How do the Retention/Success rates
of Basic Skills Courses vs. essential transfer courses (i.e. Engl-2, Phil-9É)
compare?
- Includes hiring
requests (faculty and new and replacement classified staff). FCDC will still do
the ranking.
- Examines
department/unit effectiveness and possible improvements if needed, based on
assessment data, including student success and retention rates, as well as
other Student Success Indicators.
- Evaluates
the APR Process:
- What do you find beneficial about
this APR process?
- How can we improve the process?
What must the APR
reference?
- College goals
(developed by College Council)
- Budget criteria
(developed by Budget Committee)
- Assessment data
(includes student success indicators and SLOs data)
- Improvements or
changes as a result of completing the cycle by documenting the changes made in
the department/unit due to the department's evaluation process.
Who receives and
responds to it?
- Department/Unit
Administrators
- Program Review
Committee (PRC). The Program
Review Committee (PRC) will have one Faculty Co-Chair and one Administrative
Co-Chair. Committee composition will include: 8 full-time faculty, appointed
by the Academic Senate, with representation in the following areas:
- 1 Career and Technical Education
(CTE)
- 1 General Education (GE)
- 1 Basic Skills
- 1 Student Services
- 1 Library
- 1 Faculty Chair and Directors
Council (FCDC)
- 1 Assessment Committee liaison
- 1 at-large
Up to 4
classified staff appointed by CSEA. CSEA recommends the following
representation:
- 1 Student Services
- 1 Instructional
- 1 Administrative
- 1 CSEA President or designee
Up to 4
administrators appointed by the College President. The committee recommends
the following representation:
- 1 Student Services
- 1 Instructional
- 1 Facilities
- 1 Information Technology
1 Student
representative appointed by the Student Government Association (SGA).
This will
achieve the ideal composition of at least 50% faculty and no more than 25% each
of classified staff and administrators. If the Academic Senate deems more (or
fewer) faculty are necessary to the operation of the committee, the composition
percentage must apply and classified and administrative membership adjusted
accordingly. Training in the process of program review at Bakersfield College
will be provided for committee members. Members are encouraged to serve for a
term of at least three years and may serve more than one term.
How do they respond
to it?
- Rubric
(checklist, not used for grading proposals) based on college goals, budget
criteria, assessment data, and improvements as a result of completing the cycle
by documenting the changes made in the department/unit due to the department's
evaluation process.
- Summary response
to all APRs which synthesizes common themes and issues.
- Summary response
includes Appendix of Best Practices, with contact information.
Who gets the Rubric
Response?
The department/unit
Who gets the Summary
Response?
- The Senate
President, who informs the Academic Senate
- The College
President, who informs Administrative Council
- College Council,
which represents all groups, including classified staff.
How else is the
Summary Response reported to the college community?
In writing via
- Public folders
- Website
- College
Committees
Who responds to the
Summary Response?
The College President
and College Council. President writes the response after discussion with
College Council.
Who receives the
College PresidentŐs response?
The college community.
How does the APR link
to the budget?
Through the use of the
budget criteria.
What is the timeline?
The APR must be integrated into the budget cycle.
Fall: APR
Spring: Integrated
Program Review (IPR), beginning 2012-13
Who conducts
training?
Program Review Committee
will provide training for chairs/directors